Hmm, the "AI promotes retracted articles and doesn't flag methodological issues" evaluated ChatGPT 4o-mini (very outdated) and only gave it title + abstract. Their prompt seems alright I guess.
ha, that is ironic. yes, this is indeed a problem. i know some folks who are working on different probes to test for this with more current models and they are finding similar issues.
Hmm, the "AI promotes retracted articles and doesn't flag methodological issues" evaluated ChatGPT 4o-mini (very outdated) and only gave it title + abstract. Their prompt seems alright I guess.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.2018
Ironically, this is pretty bad research! (Or at least, just very outdated due to long publication timelines - a really common issue in science of AI).
ha, that is ironic. yes, this is indeed a problem. i know some folks who are working on different probes to test for this with more current models and they are finding similar issues.